Accessibility

Accessibility statement.

What this site does to be usable by everyone, what still falls short, and how to tell me when something gets in your way.

Last updated August 3, 2026

The short version. I want this site to work for everyone, including people using a screen reader, a keyboard, magnification, or reduced motion. Most of it does. A few things don't yet, and rather than claim otherwise, they're listed below by name.

What I'm aiming for

The standard is WCAG 2.2 Level AA — the widely used international benchmark for web accessibility. This site is partially conformant: most of it meets that bar, and the specific places it doesn't are named further down.

I'd rather publish an honest account with gaps in it than a confident one that isn't true. If you find something not on this list, I want to hear about it.

What's in place

These were checked page by page across the site:

Movement and animation

There's a fair amount of gentle motion here — scrolling banners, photographs that drift slowly, text that fades in as you scroll. All of it respects your system's "reduce motion" setting. Turn that on in your operating system and the animations stop: banners hold still, photos stop drifting, and content simply appears rather than sliding in.

Nothing on this site flashes, strobes, or plays audio on its own.

Fixed since this page first went up

This statement originally listed two contrast failures. Both have been corrected, and the numbers are here so the claim is checkable rather than just asserted:

Peach is still peach where it can't cause a problem — as background fills, borders, and on the dark footer, where it was already well clear of the standard and darkening it would have made things worse. What changed is peach used as type on a light background.

Where it still falls short

One known issue:

The speaker kit page

The speaker kit is exported from a different tool rather than hand-built like the rest of the site. As a result it's missing a skip link, a main landmark, and a declared page language. It's a supporting document rather than a main page, but it's the weakest page here for assistive technology, and rebuilding it properly is the fix.

How this was checked

This is a self-assessment, not a certified audit. I reviewed the site's structure, headings, alt text, form labels, keyboard behavior, motion settings, and measured color contrast directly. No independent accessibility firm has reviewed it, and it has not been tested by people who use assistive technology day to day — which is the most valuable kind of testing, and something I'd welcome.

If something doesn't work for you

Please tell me. You don't need to know the technical term for the problem, and you don't need to be polite about it — "I couldn't read this" or "I couldn't get past this with my keyboard" is genuinely enough to act on.

Email angie@angiecarel.com and say what page you were on and what happened. I'll reply, and if you need the information in another format — plain text, a document, or just me telling you over a call — I'll get it to you that way.

Angie Carel — Fort Wayne, Indiana. See also the privacy policy and terms of use.